Menu
Wesley Cheng Home
  • Home
    • Environment
    • Literature
    • Movie Review
    • Philosophy
    • Politics
    • Racism
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Theater
  • About Me
  • Resume
  • Contact
Wesley Cheng Home

Review: Superman Returns

Posted on July 3, 2006 by Wesley

Lex Luthor glares into Lois Lane’s petrified eyes and, in a moment of clairvoyance, anticipates Lane’s next utterance. “What about…” Lois (Kate Bosworth) is hijacked mid-sentence by Luther (Kevin Spacey) “What about Superman?” Luthor blurts out.

Luthor knew what Lois was going to say next. So did the audience. The predictability of Lois and Luther’s exchange serves as a microcosm of why Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris’ “Superman Returns” lacks creativity and depth, and spends most of its time unfolding a story that we’ve seen again, and again, and again.

This time around, Superman (Brandon Routh) has returned from a five-year hiatus after searching for the remains of his home planet, Krypton. Lois, feeling abandoned, has moved on, and has a fiancé Richard White (James Marsden) and a son (Tristan Lake Leabu) to show for it.

Not so coincidentally, Clark Kent and Superman have returned at the same time, and Luthor has evaded his double-life sentence and has hatched a plan to bring the world to its knees. By stealing crystals from Krypton and harvesting its powers, Luthor’s plan is to build a new continent by taking pieces from others. The land mass will be worth a fortune as a result, and Luthor assumes the world will be lining up for prime real estate on his new country.

The plot is generic and boring, and, besides, in the end, all superhero movies are predictable. Bad guy attempts to rule Earth. Good guy stops him and the masses are saved at the end of the day. More and more, stories are reused, retold and recycled. And, truthfully speaking, Ive never minded that.

But the approach is what makes the difference. Superman Returns simply goes through the motions, dutifully fulfils its obligation of Superman saving the day, and does little else to add to the legend of Superman. It falls woefully short of other comic books, which have enjoyed brilliant movie adaptations.

The reason why Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins (2005) and Sam Raimi’s Spiderman (2002) enjoyed such success is because they explore the question “why?” Why would Bruce Wayne, prince of Gotham, dress like a bat and patrol the streets fighting crime in a customized automobile? Why would any sane human being (assuming that Peter Parker is actually sane) dress in a red and blue jumpsuit and be willing to defend justice so righteously?

The answers are given depth and cause in the Batman and Spiderman adaptations. The loss of loved ones in both movies is the driving factor, which is easily related to by the audience. Meanwhile Superman Returns answers none of these questions, and misses an opportunity to explore the tribulations and adversity of a super-being that must grapple with having to appear not-so-super at other times.

Somewhere along the line, Clark Kent must’ve struggled with his duel identity in the same way that Parker and Wayne struggled with theirs. After successfully developing his Spiderman alias, Parker’s personal life took a hit, as he saw his dear Mary Jane Watson end up with Harry Osborn. He nearly flunked out of school. He missed important dates with his grandmother.

Shortly after Wayne’s first test run as Batman, Alfred aptly notes, “Strange injuries and non-existent social life, these things beg the question as to what exactly does Bruce Wayne do with his time and his money?”

Meanwhile, Kent seems content with his surroundings. Kent takes a backseat to Superman, and seems to suffer no adverse affects. Instead, he longs for Lois from afar, despite knowing that Clark and Lois have a better chance of working out than Superman and Lois. The superhero and the dame can never be together – permanently, that is. Apparently, Lois and Superman spent the night at least once, and the child that Richard has raised so dutifully isn’t even his.

The child is weak and meager, until he hurls a piano across a room to protect Lois. Nothing else is developed with the son of Superman, which begs the question: Why was this character even introduced in the first place? Perhaps it is to show there was chemistry between Lois and Superman in the past in lue of showing it in the movie. Few sparks fly between Lois and Kent aside from a few awkward glances, and the romance between Superman and Lois onscreen are forced, at best, and lacking in background and development, at least.

Despite having virtually no character development, the movie lasts more than two and a half hours. Where did the time go? Most of it is devoted to scene after scene of applauding crowds, Superman flying into space, shaking glasses (signaling the beginning of an action sequence) and Luthor exploring the power of the crystals from Superman’s world (as if he, or the audience, didn’t know of the awesome power it would yield).

A final comparison to Batman and Spiderman — both movies used outstanding special effects, but the effects were not the draw of the movie. Rather, they were used to enhance it. In Superman, the special effects are the main draw. At least, that’s what I believe, since without it, we’re left with the same predictable story that we’ve seen again, and again, and again.

Rating: ** (out of five).

  • Brandon Routh
  • Superman
  • Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • February 2022
    • November 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • December 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • April 2019
    • November 2015
    • July 2015
    • September 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • October 2013
    • May 2013
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • February 2011
    • August 2010
    • May 2010
    • March 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • April 2008
    • February 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • September 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    ©2023 Wesley Cheng Home | Powered by WordPress & Superb Themes