Menu
Wesley Cheng Home
  • Home
    • Environment
    • Literature
    • Movie Review
    • Philosophy
    • Politics
    • Racism
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Theater
  • About Me
  • Resume
  • Contact
Wesley Cheng Home

Burress not essential to Giants’ success

Posted on October 7, 2008 by Wes

Plaxico Burress was curiously unapologetic.

Noting that he hadn’t “lost any sleep” during his suspension, Burress returned to Giants practice on Monday following the team’s 44-6 rout of the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday. Burress had been suspended for two weeks and one game after Burress skipped a team meeting two weeks ago without notifying the Giants.

“They feel that they needed to do that,” Burress said in a conference call Monday afternoon. “I took it with a grain of salt and kept on moving.”

The question now is whether Burress is moving in the same direction as the Giants.

Sunday’s 38-point margin was the largest for the Giants since 1972, and it certainly seemed like New York was fine without its top receiver.
Actually, it was better than fine.

Up and down the lineup, the Giants were brilliant. There was Burress’ replacement, Domenik Hixon, whose 102 yards and a touchdown all came in the first half. Wideout Sinorice Moss chipped in two touchdowns, as did running back Brandon Jacobs, who also rumbled for 136 yards. And then there was quarterback Eli Manning, who finished with 267 yards and two TDs, plus a 136.6 passer rating, the highest single-game rating of his career.

As a team, the Giants steamrolled the Seahawks for 523 total yards, 342 in the first half.

All of this was done with Burress sitting at home.

If nothing else, the Giants sent a clear message to the league that they are the team to beat, with weapons up and down the lineup, especially at the skill positions. As for Burress, the message the Giants sent to him was crystal clear: Show up, or ship out, talent notwithstanding.

That was the resounding message over the summer when New York shipped Jeremy Shockey to the New Orleans Saints for second and fifth round picks.

To be sure, the Giants didn’t get the better end of the deal in talent, but Shockey’s replacement, Kevin Boss, is far better for the locker room makeup of this team.

Analysis believed one of the reasons for Manning’s stunning development at the end of last season was because of Shockey’s absence. With one less voice shouting in the huddle, Manning was better able to assert himself in leading the Giants to the Super Bowl.

The move was signed to put the sum of the whole ahead of its parts.

Could Burress be next?

For now, it’s unlikely.

Sunday’s dominant performance without Burress aside, the Giants are still lead by Burress’ 18 receptions this season after leading the Giants in the same category with 70 last year.

Certainly, without Burress’ 11 receptions for 151 yards against the Packers in the National Football Conference Championship game last season, the Giants would not be reigning champs today.

But Burress’ defiant post-suspension behavior is peculiar. Although the Giants are unquestionably a more talented and dangerous team with Burress on the field, Sunday’s performance showed the Giants have a deep depth chart, and can be successful without Burress.

Burress’ best approach to defuse the situation would’ve been an apology along with a promise to put the team before himself.

That, however, was not Burress’ response.

“What was I supposed to do, cry?” said Burress.

No. Burress was just supposed to make sure it didn’t happen again.

But based on his response, and his unwillingness to admit that he made a mistake, it seems like this will continue to happen again in the future. The message of a team-first concept seems to be lost on Burress.

One missed practice won’t stamp Burress ticket out of New York, but with his current attitude and his track record, he’s certainly heading in that direction.
Said Burress: “I took it, walked out and left.”

If Burress is not careful, the Giants might let him walk out for good next time.

  • Football
  • NFL
  • Plaxico Burress
  • Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Archives

    • August 2024
    • April 2024
    • January 2024
    • June 2023
    • February 2023
    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • February 2022
    • November 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • December 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • April 2019
    • November 2015
    • July 2015
    • September 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • October 2013
    • May 2013
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • February 2011
    • August 2010
    • May 2010
    • March 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • April 2008
    • February 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • September 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    ©2025 Wesley Cheng Home | Powered by Superb Themes