Menu
Wesley Cheng Home
  • Home
    • Environment
    • Literature
    • Movie Review
    • Philosophy
    • Politics
    • Racism
    • Sports
    • Technology
    • Television
    • Theater
  • About Me
  • Resume
  • Contact
Wesley Cheng Home

Review: RG FC250 Handheld

Posted on December 31, 2022December 31, 2022 by Wesley
RG FC250 Retro Handheld
Price: $10-$15
Find it on: eBay, Amazon, AliExpress
Rating: 8.5/10

Pros:
πŸ‘πŸ» Responsive action/d-pad buttons
πŸ‘πŸ» Rumble/USB-C/P2 remote
πŸ‘πŸ» TV-out/Volume wheel

Cons:
πŸ‘ŽπŸ» Relatively bulky
πŸ‘ŽπŸ» Super Mario Bros. overclocked
πŸ‘ŽπŸ» Only about 20 true classic games

There are probably three dozen retro game handhelds on the market right now in the $15 range that do pretty much the same thing. They’ll play a large variety of NES games off a cheap SoC cheaply soldered inside an even cheaper plastic casing. I’ve reviewed several of these so far, but the one I’ve found best in class is the RS-60. And, so, I’ll compare every retro handheld in this price range to that gold standard.

But first, a caveat about the RS-60: While I loved it, it also fell apart quickly. The first device I received was damaged on arrival, and could only load about 20% of the games. I figured this was a one-off, and ordered another. A second device did come, and for several months, worked just fine. But inevitably, because of how thin the device was and how cheaply it was constructed, it became a clunker too.

It’s with that lens that I review the RG FC250 Handheld, which I got on sale for $11 on Amazon. Like all of the devices in this range, it promises hundreds of games in one unit. And like all devices in this range, you only get about 15-20 titles that you’ve heard of, with the rest either terrible homebrews or repeated games. There’s nothing new about that here. I was hoping this device would have Super Mario Bros. 3, but that was missing from the “520 games” that are packed on this SoC. And while there is the original Super Mario Bros. game, it’s overclocked at about 150% and is frustrating to play. Comparatively, the library of the FC250 isn’t as good as the RS-60.

Comparing the form factor of the RG FC250 to the RS-60, the FC250 is considerably larger. The shell is about a half inch wider, but the depth is about 4x that of the RS-60. That comes with benefits, though. The first thing I noticed was that the D-pad and action buttons had considerable depth and travel to them. If you can believe it, the cushion of the D-pad was actually squishier than the D-pad on the Odin Lite. This was a significant upgrade to the clickiness of the RS-60.

The FC250 also has about 40 games with a rumble option, and the unit does shake, though I didn’t find that it added all that much to the gaming experienceβ€”it was more of a gimmick, but it does show why the build has a bit more heft. The screen is also brighter than the RS-60. The viewing angles up-and-down were excellent, though the viewing angles left-to-right washed almost immediately.

I’ve only owned this unit for a few weeks now, but it seems like the weight of the FC250 will make it more durable, and I’m confident than several months from now when I’m dusting it out of my desk drawer, it will still work like the first day I received it. Another nice feature of the form factor that you can swap out the 600mAh lithium battery, which is the standard battery for a variety of low-end cellphones. It’s charged with USB-C, another improvement over the RS-60. Other hardware features include a sound wheel, a TV out port, and a controller that acts as a player two.

In the end, the FC250 is a worthy competitor to RS-60. While it is not as pocketable as the RS-60, it’s still also very small and is about the size of a normal men’s wallet. What you get in return (improved controls, screen, USB-C, rumble and TV-out) should make you consider this if you’re in that under $20 range.

  • Retro Handhelds
  • RG FC250 Handheld
  • Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    • December 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • August 2022
    • February 2022
    • November 2021
    • July 2021
    • May 2021
    • November 2020
    • September 2020
    • December 2019
    • September 2019
    • August 2019
    • April 2019
    • November 2015
    • July 2015
    • September 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • October 2013
    • May 2013
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • February 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • February 2011
    • August 2010
    • May 2010
    • March 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • April 2008
    • February 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • September 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • January 2003
    • December 2002
    • November 2002
    • October 2002
    • September 2002
    • July 2002
    • May 2002
    • April 2002
    ©2023 Wesley Cheng Home | Powered by WordPress & Superb Themes